Every day our office receives calls from potential clients who want to know whether what happened to them or to their loved one qualifies as medical malpractice and whether they can bring a valid claim in court. More often than not, these potential clients are legitimate victims of medical malpractice. However, we often have to turn down the calls that we receive. Why? While admittedly it is a somewhat of a sad state of affairs, the answer is purely economic. The following examples should help to illustrate the problem.
Cases Where There Is Not A Permanent Substantial Injury
For example, consider the case of the patient who goes in to have a surgery after their hand is injured in an industrial accident. Say that the surgery is negligently performed and the client ends up with the hand being even worse than it was before the surgery. This is probably medical malpractice. However, say that the patient undergoes a second surgery a week later which properly repairs the hand back to 100%. Now, let’s say that this individual calls our office wanting to know if he has a case. How would we evaluate the situation?
Although it may be relatively undisputed that the first surgery was a significant and clear instance of medical malpractice, the case we just described is a case that our firm would probably not take. “Wait a minute,” you may be saying, “Why would you not take the case? The surgery was negligently performed, the doctor made the hand worse, the malpractice is pretty clear.” Let’s take a look at the potential damages and recovery in this case.
As a result of the negligently performed surgery, the patient had to undergo a second surgery to properly repair the hand. Chances are the patient also had pain and suffering during the week between the two surgeries and he may have had to miss time from work. Let’s say that the second surgery cost $7,000, that the patient had $500 in lost wages during the week he was out of work (there will be no future lost wages), and that he is owed $2,500 in pain and suffering, bringing the total amount of damages to $10,000. “Not a bad chunk of change,” you say, “Why not file the lawsuit?” The answer: soaring medical malpractice case expenses.
In medical malpractice cases expert testimony is usually required, and this case will be no exception. We will need to hire a doctor to review the entire medical chart of the patient, paying particular attention to the surgical notes and other documentation concerning the first surgery. Hiring a doctor to do this will likely cost several thousand dollars, and that is just for him to review the records! Then, it is likely that the defense lawyer will want to take our expert doctor’s deposition. These depositions can often drag on for many hours, and doctors usually charge many hundreds of dollars per hour for their deposition. Then, there is the actual trial where doctors charge even more per hour for their time, and so far we have only discussed the case expense of the expert witness!
There are other untold expenses that go into preparing for a trial. Everything from court costs to digital document exhibit preparation can make trying a medical malpractice case very, very expensive. Suddenly, our firm is running the risk of having spent more money in retaining experts and preparing for trial than will ultimately be recovered at the end of the case (not to mention the time and effort that we could have expended elsewhere). As you may be beginning to see, our firm will not be able to stay in business if it continues to take on these kinds of cases!
Call 800.637.8170 to request a free copy of The Ohio Medical Malpractice Book and set up a free consultation with our Ohio medical malpractice lawyers.
Recent Comments